Address by Mr Bantu Holomisa, MP in the Parliamentary Debate: Budget Vote 30 – Environment (28 May 2013) Chairperson, Minister and Deputy Minister and Honourable Members, The UDM supports Budget Vote 30. The high incidents of rhino poaching in South Africa over the past few years have been a cause of much embarrassment. More disappointing, however, is to see that South Africa seems incapable of dealing with this problem. State Security has failed to gather intelligence on rhino poaching in South Africa. Such intelligence would enable us to nip this problem in the bud. Rhino poaching has even risen in our transfrontier parks. Every day we read disturbing newspaper reports that rhino poaching has increased in parts of these Parks that are in our neighbouring countries. While noble ideals underpinned the development of these Parks, the rise in rhino poaching in these Parks requires urgent attention. Chairperson, We are duty bound to make environmental issues attractive to the people. This we can do by ensuring that we avoid using arcane academic language and jargon when we talk to our people about environmental issues. More important is that we develop practical solutions to environmental challenges for the public to implement. Some of these solutions include, but are not limited to, packaging environmental solutions with food security initiatives and commercial foresting. People should also be encouraged to engage in tree-planting activities, as indigenous forests play a critical role in protecting homes against natural disasters. I thank you.
Address by Mr Bantu Holomisa, MP in the Parliamentary Debate: Budget Vote 6 – Performance Monitoring and Evaluation (28 May 2013) Chairperson, Minister and Deputy Minister and Honourable Members, The UDM supports Budget Vote 6. Today, we are debating the Budget Vote of one of Government Departments that has a broad mandate. Used properly, the Department’s mandate could enable it to meaningfully and positively affect the service delivery chain. When this Department was established, its leadership was in a fortunate position in that unlike other well-established departments, it did not inherit employees from previous administrations. It had a rare opportunity to recruit and appoint the right people. Time will tell whether or not the Department put this opportunity wisely. However, the wave of service delivery protests over the past few years are a clear indication that the public sector service delivery chain is full of bottlenecks and inefficiencies. The root cause of these problems can be attributed to poor coordination of government programmes. In other words, the right hand does not know or shows no interest in what the left hand is doing. This lack of coordination often results in a situation where some Heads of Provincial Governments run their provinces as if we are in a federal state. We therefore hope that, in its effort to improve Public Sector Oversight, as one of its key priorities for the 2013/14 fiscal year, the Department pays particular attention to the aforementioned challenges. To conclude, it is my considered view that National Planning and Performance, Monitoring and Evaluation should be merged into one Department. Once this is done, the experienced Minister Trevor Manuel be put in charge of the new Department. This is because logic dictates that a person who develops a plan is better placed to monitor and evaluate its implementation. Furthermore, his National Development Plan impacts directly on the mandate of this Department. I thank you.
Address by Mr Stanley Ntapane, MP in the Parliamentary Debate: The death of Mpumalanga initiates (29 May 2013) Mister Speaker, Ministers and Deputy Ministers and Honourable Members, The UDM expresses its heartfelt condolences to the families and friends of the 30 initiates who died recently at various initiation schools in Mpumalanga. There are also unconfirmed reports that 6 initiates have died at initiation schools in Limpopo as well and we are saddened by this. The tragic deaths of these young men could have been avoided had all the relevant stakeholders played their parts. In particular, traditional leaders, as custodians of our culture, are not doing enough to oversee initiation schools in their areas of jurisdiction, leaving the traditional surgeons and amakhankatha to do figure out what to do as they go along. This failure of leadership has left Government with no choice but to intervene in an effort to try to bring stability. Many have complained about this intervention from Government, but let us admit that it is the only thing that has brought a semblance of stability in the tradition. We call on traditional leaders to show leadership on this matter. No culture or tradition can be more important than the lives of our children. Parents on the other hand often wait for a long time before they report to the authorities that their sons are experiencing problems. In such instances, parents should also be held accountable for any injury or loss of life, even if these occurred in a legal initiation school. Such a punitive measure would ensure that parents do not willy-nilly shift the blame to the traditional surgeons and amakhankatha when something goes wrong. This important step will lead to early detection of problems and, once remedial action has been taken, help reduce deaths at initiation schools. Mister Speaker, In the final analysis, the law must take its course on all those who are responsible for the deaths of young men at initiation schools both in the aforementioned provinces and as well as other provinces. Thank you.
Address by Mr Lennox Gaehler, MP in the Parliamentary Debate: Budget Vote 26: Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (29 May 2013) Chairperson, Minister and Deputy Minister and Honourable Members, The UDM supports Budget Vote 26. Since 2009 we have been hoping that we would reach a point where the Minister would successfully turn the Department around and place it on a path to efficiency and effectiveness, but this has thus far proven to be wishful thinking. Instead, the situation in the Department has taken a turn for the worse. For evidence one has to look no further than the fact that, while the Department has spent more 90% of its budget, only 52% of its targets have been achieved. Two questions now come to mind: “Where did the money go? Has it been diverted to President Zuma’s Zero Hunger Programme?” Minister, the public deserves to know what happened to rest of the money. Chairperson, I have received numerous complaints from emerging farmers around the country about the Department’s mechanisation programme. Many of the complaints echo the UDM’s sentiments that it is difficult to accurately determine who benefits from this project when the Department has no policy on the distribution of tractors. The UDM has been calling on the Department to address this problem for a while now without success. We hope the Department will take this matter seriously this time around. Chairperson, Monitoring and evaluation of existing programmes in the Department is very weak, to say the least. For example, every year the Department gives money to provinces in order to ensure the success of the Comprehensive Agriculture Support Programme (CASP), but it does not monitor how the funds have been used and whether they have been used for the intended purpose. To make matters worse, the officials who are in charge of the CASP programme do not reply to complaints from members of the public about the programme. They also fail to reply to our correspondence about it. I thank you.
Address by Mr Bantu Holomisa, MP in the Parliamentary Debate: Budget Vote 5 – International Relations & Cooperation (30 May 2013) Mister Speaker, Ministers and Deputy Ministers and Honourable Members, The UDM supports Budget Vote 5. We wish to thank the Department for all the good things it has done. I will however leave the enumeration of the Department’s achievements to its praise singers. During our oversight visit to the Department’s Head Offices in Pretoria at the beginning of the year, we were shocked to learn that the Director General (DG) of the Department and his senior officials had not been briefed about the 2012 agreement to deploy South African troops in the Central African Republic (CAR). Yet they are the first line of defence with respect to our foreign policy. Whilst still on the subject of CAR deployment, could the Honourable Minister take the Nation into confidence and explain operation Morero and its implications? It would be interesting to know whether the President briefed the Honourable Minister timeously about the 2012 CAR deployment. If yes, why did you not brief your DG and his deputies? If not, would you not agree with someone who says that your mandate as the Head of our foreign policy was hijacked? We ask these questions because the President is duty bound to consult with the Departments of Defence, State Security and International Relations as well as Parliament in all foreign military deployments. Could it be that your Department was also bypassed in government’s dubious decision to support regime change in Libya? If this is the norm, then there is a possibility that the Presidency bypassed your Office and gave direct instructions to the Chief of State Protocol, Bruce Koloane during the Guptagate scandal. Would you deny this Honourable Minister? In any event, I am still wondering why a person who is supposed to have delegated powers should require permission from the Executive to authorise the landing of an aeroplane at an unclassified airport. The fact that the Presidency has no portfolio committee leaves the onus is on you, Honourable Minister, to explain these matters to the public. Thank you.
Address by Mr Stanley Ntapane, MP in the Parliamentary Debate: Budget Vote 33: Rural Development and Land Reform (31 May 2013) Mr Speaker and honourable Members, The UDM supports Budget Vote 33. President Zuma announced in the 2013 State of the Nation Address (SONA) that government would reopen the lodgement of claims in order to accommodate those who missed the December 31, 1998 deadline and to accommodate the Koi and San people who were dispossessed of their land prior to the 1913 Land Act. We were too happy to hear this announcement from the President. And as expected, this raised our people’s expectations. However, after scrutinising Government’s track record in processing land claims, we are left wondering whether it has the capacity to deal with new land claims considering that it is still struggling to address the current backlog on outstanding land claims. The Department also has inadequate post-transfer farmer support programmes. Nowhere is this more evident than in the low number of land-reform beneficiaries who are actively farming. And in the majority of cases where there is some agricultural activity, many of the beneficiaries use only a small piece of their land. In addition, an increasing number of farms have become white elephants in the post-transfer period. One such example is a farm in KwaZulu-Natal that used to produce 4000 tons of bananas, which has now become a white elephant. Mister Speaker, We have been receiving complaints from members of the public about the land reform programme. It seems there is a growing perception out there that the majority of land reform beneficiaries are male. We call on the Department to look into this matter and ensure that its land reform programme is line with gender equity policies. We hope that once completed the research report on reopening land claims will, among others, speak directly to these problems. We wish to take this opportunity to commend the Department for all the good work it has done thus far. Thank you.
Address by Mr Stanley Ntapane, MP in the Parliamentary Youth Day Debate: Youth at the centres of economic Opportunities (04 June 2013) Mr Speaker and honourable Members, We commemorate Youth Day at a time when youth unemployment in South Africa has reached crisis levels. Facts and statistics on unemployment from Statistics South Africa’s latest Labour Force Survey show that unemployment for people between the ages of 15-34 in South Africa stands at 70.7 per cent. This means that more young people are idle than ever before. Mister Speaker, This high rate of youth unemployment is a ticking time bomb that threatens to worsen political instability in South Africa, as millions of young people are not only jobless but have also lost hope about ever finding a job. There are numerous contributing factors to this challenge. The most obvious one, however, is the poor quality of our basic education system. The South African education system is failing to equip our youth with basic skills. Unless Government improves the education system, unemployment will be an albatross around our necks for many years to come. Whilst fixing our education system is a medium to long-term project, there are a number of immediate interventions Government can make to remove the youth from the periphery of economic activity. For instance, in some developing countries Governments invest significant resources in the professionalisation and development of informal sector businesses. This has helped to reduce youth unemployment and unemployment in general and could work in South Africa as well. We are aware that channelling youth to the informal sector is not a panacea for the youth unemployment problem, but it does serve as an important source employment. Furthermore, a thriving informal sector would ensure that the youth are able to contribute to the economy, albeit less effectively than they could be. However, such measures are possible only if Government depoliticises youth development organisations, such as the National Youth Development Agency in order to ensure that they effectively discharge their mandates. All in all, to diminish the chronic youth unemployment problem, Government needs to adopt economic policies that ignite economic growth and build an education system capable of unleashing the potential of the South African economy. Thank you.
UDM condemns human waste in protests in the Western Cape – Member’s Statement in Parliament, by Mr SZ Ntapane, MP (UDM Chief Whip) on 6 June 2013 The United Democratic Movement (UDM) condemns the ANC Youth League’s (ANCYL’s) use of human waste in protest for portable loos in the Western Cape. Whatever the concerns, nothing justifies stooping to such a low level. The UDM has for many years warned the public about ruling party’s use of the principle of ungovernability and anarchy in areas where it is not in power. And this is exactly what is happening now in the Western Cape Province. We have also warned the Democratic Alliance (DA) Provincial Government on numerous occasions about the dangers of failing to meaningfully consult communities that are affected by its boardroom decisions. The UDM calls on the ruling party’s mother-body to rein in its recalcitrant youth that is using innocent people as pawns in their efforts to make the Province ungovernable. We also call on the DA government to meaningfully engage township communities on its portable loos and other Provincial Government policies affecting them.