Admin
13 Sep, 2025
Fair access, safer roads: UDM on e-hailing regulation
Statement by Yongama Zigebe, Councillor in the City of Johannesburg for the United Democratic Movement and Chairperson of the S79 Committee on Gender, Youth and People with Disabilities The United Democratic Movement (UDM) in the City of Johannesburg welcomes the gazetting of the National Land Transport Amendment Act and its regulations, which now officially recognise e-hailing as a legitimate mode of transport in South Africa. This long overdue development provides clarity, protection, and structure for both commuters and drivers, ensuring safety and accountability in a sector that has for too long operated in a legal grey area. However, this move comes in the wake of painful tragedies. Recently, the gruesome killing of e-hailing driver Mthokozisi Mvelase at Maponya Mall shocked the nation. This is not an isolated incident other drivers and commuters have fallen victim to violence, intimidation, and crime linked to the previously unregulated state of the industry. The UDM in the City of Johannesburg maintains that legislation must be matched by effective enforcement on the ground to restore confidence and protect lives. While we welcome the formal recognition of e-hailing in South Africa, the industry is currently dominated by foreign nationals. This reality limits South Africans’ meaningful participation in an important sector of the economy. The UDM proposes a regulatory framework that balances opportunity and inclusivity: at least 70 percent of operating permits should be reserved for South African citizens, while 30 percent may be allocated to documented migrants. This approach ensures that locals can access jobs and economic empowerment while maintaining space for legally residing foreigners to contribute. The UDM in the City of Johannesburg will, therefore, continue to advocate for stricter regulation of such industries to ensure that job opportunities, particularly in the transport sector, are reserved for South Africans. We call on law enforcement agencies, the Department of Transport, and local government to work with urgency to implement the provisions of the Act. Panic buttons, proper operating licenses, visible branding of vehicles, and rigorous compliance checks must be enforced without delay. The UDM in the City of Johannesburg stands firmly with e-hailing drivers and commuters, committed to building a safer, fairer, and more dignified public transport system that prioritises the interests of South Africans.
Admin
15 Aug, 2019
Eastern Cape Legislature: Mr Mncedisi Filtane, MPL’s contribution Vote: transport
1. Transportation plays a very critical role in the economy and livelihoods in our province. It’s all about moving goods and passengers. 2. The hot and cold relationship that this department has with the taxi industry remains, not just a matter of ongoing concern, but a risk to the above-mentioned scenario. Finally, a lasting solution needs to be found. 3. The atrocious conditions of the majority of road networks, mainly in the rural areas, makes it least interesting and attractive to venture out there for any purpose at all. Yet we are in a predominately rural province. This inhibits the development and growth of the rural economies. These conditions have a direct and significant impact on the drive towards urbanisation. The consequence of which is the burdening of local government with early arrivals of urban dwellers. 4. As a member of the economic cluster, the department is expected to play a significant role in the creation of both work and business opportunities. However, the MEC sends contradicting messages in her policy speech. On page 4, she starts off by pencilling: “We will implement a procurement strategy that seeks to contribute to SMME and Local Economic Development”. Then four paragraphs further down, she laments the fact that road infrastructure is driven, in the main, by external service providers instead of the department’s internal teams. “We want to ensure that external service providers complement our internal teams instead of the current scenario where they do the bulk of our work”. Asazi ke ukuba masise eyiphi Komkhulu. Then she goes on to pain the Eastern Cape economy by telling us that she has splurged R252 million on one or a same suppliers of plant items. Had that budget been spent on actual operations, so many of local entrepreneurs would have benefited. As a result, so much of our taxes are going to be tied up in depreciating machinery which must be maintained. whereas this would have been the responsibility of the private sector. 5. The much-anticipated roads masterplan has yet to be presented to the committee. Consequently, there is just no indication of the direction which this department is going. No details are being availed at all about the roads which are going to be improved. This feud situation lends itself very much vulnerable for the mishandling of funds. 6. There are no new road-making methodologies being explored yet some have been available from as far back as 2006. 7. Further signs of a confused department are in programme for transport regulation. A whopping R2,5 million has been set aside for road safety prayers, but the budget for the Law Enforcement function has been reduced by 9.2%. It looks like this department is more ready for prayers, which lend no technical expertise on traffic management. To put an icing on the ongoing confusion there is a budget of R50 m for no specific activity. Cash is just being splashed about. Hayi kumnandi Kwa Transport VHAA!!!
